When Sarah Palin booked a flight to Europe, the French immediately surrendered.
Tuesday - July 13, 2004
Either Kerry Lied .. or .. Kerry Lied
And he still keeps lying. David Limbaugh has an excellent article about liars and people who lie about liars. Here are a few choice excerpts and my personal observations ....If lying is wrong -- and it is -- lying about lying (falsely accusing others of lying) is also wrong. So if lying about WMD is wrong, so are false accusations that President Bush lied about WMD.Well, did Bush actually "lie" about WMD's? C'mon tell me more ....
Two recent news stories tend to exonerate the president with respect to Iraqi WMD. One concerns the overworked Democratic allegation that Bush lied in his 2003 State of the Union Speech in saying that Saddam sought to acquire uranium from Niger. Yet the British are set to release a report finding that Saddam indeed may have tried to procure substantial quantities of this vital nuclear weapons component after all.Aha! There goes one leg of that lie the Dummycraps have been peddling. We've already made note in a recent post here about 1.77 metric tons of low-enriched uranium found in Iraq recently. Methinks the plot thickens.
The other exculpatory factoid, ironically, is implicit in the newly published Senate Intelligence Committee report that we had miserable intelligence failures respecting Iraqi WMD leading up to the war. The Committee concluded, based on hundreds of interviews with intelligence officials, that the Bush administration did not try to pressure the CIA to fabricate or exaggerate the case for Iraqi WMD. If the primary American spy agency told the administration (and Congress) that Saddam was feverishly pursuing WMD and acknowledges that the administration didn't pressure it to say so, isn't it obvious that the president wasn't lying about WMD?Yes, we had miserable intelligence. Why? Because for three decades the CIA has had its hands tied and budgets cut by Dummycraps in Congress and the Clinton administration. But that's another story. The point here is that the Bush administration just took what intel it had and made the best decision it could based on that intel. Intel that was shared with Congress and believed by Kerry and the other Dummycraps .... who also signed on to go after Saddam and end the threat. The key point here, however, is that Bush did not pressure the CIA or alter the intel he received. Thus, no lie.
More significantly, the president didn't make this decision alone. Congress, including Senators Kerry and Edwards, joined him in it after reviewing the same intelligence data. So when Kerry accuses Bush of lying about Iraqi WMD, he is tacitly implicating himself in the same lie. Kerry has really boxed himself in here. Either Bush lied, in which case Kerry did, too, or Bush did not lie, but Kerry is still lying by maintaining, falsely, that Bush lied. Either way, Kerry is lying. Amazing, when you consider the whole thrust of the Democratic case against President Bush is his alleged dishonesty. And just so we're clear, Kerry continues to accuse Bush of lying, even following the release of the Committee report.Yep, Kerry has really caught himself in a trap here. He saw the same intel and made the same decision Bush did. Of course, Senator Waffles can't change his story now even though both legs of his lie have been broken. He must still continue to hobble along until November spewing out the same tired lies accusing Bush of lying. So who is the liar here? The man who is trying to protect America with the best information available (Bush) or the man who is telling lies and attempting to divide America based on those lies (Kerry)?
You can read the rest of David Limbaugh's editorial here. I urge you to read all of it. I urge everyone to read it, Dummycraps included. While you read it, be honest with yourself. Let the facts speak for themselves. To do otherwise would be disengenuous and will only serve to further spread the lies .... and that would make you a liar too, wouldn't it?
Posted by The Skipper
on 07/13/2004 at 05:04 PM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (7)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - July 12, 2004
Who Said It, Part II
Allan, here. I just thought I'd throw a few quotes at ya to strengthen Vilmar's case in the earlier post. It is entirely asanine behavior for the Left to pretend that Bush lied and took the country to war. These people quoted below all had the same intel that Bush had and some maybe even more. Quite a few of these quotes are from people who were in office before Bush was elected. They all pretend ignorance today and blame Bush for everything. There are liars, damned liars .... and then there are the people below - who almost without exception are all boneheaded, hypocritical weasels. We now present for your entertainment ...."We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002.
"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others
"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998
The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002
"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998
"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003
"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998
"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998
"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002
Posted by The Skipper
on 07/12/2004 at 09:06 AM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (10)
•
Trackbacks(1)
Permalink • Who Said It?!?!
Surely you remember the cacophonous roar of the panty-waisted traitorous liberals in the last few months, to include the 9-11 commission and especially the media, trying to tell the American public that President Bush said "Iraq is an imminent threat to the US."Over and over again, like a bad Roger Moore movie misrepresenting falsehoods for facts, we here that this was the reason we attacked Iraq.
Well, for those of you capable of rational thought, you know President Bush never said that.
However...............The Breck Girl did! Read the sixth entry attributed to Edwards in this transcript:
And OBTW, that deafening silence you hear is the media.
Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler
on 07/12/2004 at 06:40 AM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - July 11, 2004
Experience Counts
Senator John Edwards has been chosen as the Dummycraps' Vice-Presidential candidate. He has been a Senator for only five years. Before that, he became a millionaire as a
Posted by The Skipper
on 07/11/2004 at 06:45 PM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - July 10, 2004
Dirtbags on the Left Coast
A solider returns from fighting in Iraq. He was wounded there. He participates in his hometown 4th of July parade and hears what all soldiers fear: cries of baby killer, murderer, and lots of "boos!"It all started when one of the parade announcers looks at him and in a sarcastic voice, says into the microphone, "And what exactly are you a veteran of?" That's all the crowd needed to begin its atrocious behavior.
Of course, she is now backpedaling so fast her shoes melted off her feet. Her defenders are saying those words were directed to President Bush and not the soldier.
And, also, this happened in the Socialist state of Washington on the leftist paradise of Bainbridge Island where Kerry's supporters marching in the parade were cheered to high heaven.
One last note: that announcer's father? He died in Vietnam.
(must.....control....the......fist......of........death!)
Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler
on 07/10/2004 at 07:18 AM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (7)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - July 08, 2004
DNC Flip-Flops
In honor of John Kerry's position shifts on issues, the DNC is having trouble deciding which bloggers to invite to the Convention later this month. First, they notify the blogger he or she has been accepted then they tell them the next day that they have been rejected.Bill, at INDC Journal got "the treatment" first. Then John Tobain got treated the same way.
Both of the bloggers above are conservative sites. Could this be a plot by the DNC to keep possible "unfriendly" bloggers away?
Either way, we here at BMEWS have absolutely no desire to set foot in Boston for the convention. I predict there will be so many Leftist Moonbats in the city during the convention that a new space-time continuum phenomenum could occur: a mental black-hole, wherein all rational thought is sucked into an enormous vortex from which no sane speech can escape. We've alerted Stephen Hawking to our theory.
Posted by The Skipper
on 07/08/2004 at 11:07 AM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (7)
•
Trackbacks(1)
Permalink • The Poodle and The Breck Girl
By now if you do not know that The Poodle selected The Breck Girl to be his running "mate" then you've been living in a cave.Could it be that he did this so if the elections do go as he expects he'll have The Breck Girl handy to file a lawsuit? Maybe call in the UN to mediate or pass a resolution?
No matter. Hundreds of articles will be written about The Poodle's choice and hundreds more about The Breck Girl himself.
So here's my $.02's worth.
For most Republicans and Conservatives, this presents us with wonderful targets: You have two HUGELY rich millionaires campaigning and calling themselves the champions of the underprivileged!! That's a bit much. It's a joke really that anyone could ever fall for that. You also have The Poodle with his numerous flip flops on issues, the latest of which was his stance on abortion. He's against it but has never signed any bill along those lines. I read somewhere that if this were the 1860s era and Kerry was running against Lincoln with the discussion being slavery, then Kerry would say that as a Catholic he personally does not believe in it but he has to respect the rights and opinions of Protestants and other Christian voters who favor it.
Sorry, a guy that can't vote his convictions is a piece of shit as far as I am concerned.
Then he goes out on the stump talking about "values." VALUES?!?!?! From this fucktard?
Try some consistency, you asshole! That's something I value. But he can't do it. It is not his nature. He's a new age guy full of nuances. Hey, John! Stick your nuances up your ass!
One last thing: Kerry keeps saying he wants to eliminate Bush's tax cuts to the rich.
He is worth millions, his wife, anywhere between 800 million and a billion. Edwards is worth about 60 million. You think changing this law will affect them? HA!
Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler
on 07/08/2004 at 07:38 AM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - July 07, 2004
Update! Update!
Remember a few days ago I posted about how some traitorous Dummycrap pieces of shit had written the UN asking them to send observers to monitor our election this year?Well, the UN turned it down saying the request had to come "from a national government or an electoral authority." I'm sure the verminous traitors were disappointed.
In this update article there is one fantastic quote by a member of GOPUSA.com
"Let me get this straight. A group of Democrats want to bring some people from countries like North Korea, Iran, Syria, China and Cuba – people that have never seen a democratic election in their lifetimes – to sit in judgment on our elections? What kind of voodoo politics is that? The last time a foreign body had any direct influence over the political process of this country, the situation was corrected by a war for our freedom from British rule. Are these so-called Americans so willing to surrender that hard-won right of self-determination now, and to such a shamelessly scandal-ridden group of anti-American dictatorships and terrorist sympathizers? We may as well dissolve the Union now and save ourselves the pain of watching it done for us."
You GO, Joe!!
As for the rats, a slow painful death would be too good for them but I am not in a position to administer it, even as Benevolent Dictator. I can only hope the people in the districts served by these moonbat fucktards kick them out on their asses at the next election.
DAMN IT!! I am still pissed off to think that our own elected officials would so casually turn over our election to a bunch of shitheels at the UN!!
DAMMIT!!! FUCK!! SHIT!!! HATE!!!
(there, I feel better now!)
Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler
on 07/07/2004 at 01:58 PM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Health Crisis?
Is it just a failed memory or does anyone else remember the distortions behind these numbers mentioned by The Poodle (and soon to be echoed by his VP nominee, the Breck Girl.)Lurch is saying there are 43 million Americans without health insurance. Think about that number---it is about 15% of our population.
I recall reading somewhere that these numbers are fallacious simply because they include:
--- people who are already covered under someone else's insurance
---people who have health plans but choose not to pay the premium because they'd rather spend their money on wide screen TVs and beer
---shitloads of young people who figure that rather than spend money on insurance bet on their own youth and health to keep them relatively safe. Hey, I remember when I was young I hardly EVER got sick. Ran a saw through one of my fingers once but that's about it. Hell, I still hardly ever catch a cold.
So here we go again, more lies and distortions from the party that made lying an art form.
If The Poodle and the Breck Girl get their way, their proposal will set us back a TRILLION dollars. Try to conceptualize a trillion dollars. Laid end to end it's 500 BILLION feet or 94,696,970 miles (farther than from here to the sun!)
Here's another way to look at it. Assuming we have 140 million people working in the US, that would cost EACH and EVERY ONE of us about $715 per year (no excuses, no exemptions, EVERYONE pays!) Are you ready for that? How about this? Are you ready for paying double that because The Poodle proposes tax credits for many people under his plan who he feels can least afford to pay.
Read this article Prepare to get terrified!
Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler
on 07/07/2004 at 09:44 AM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (9)
•
Trackbacks(1)
Permalink • Thursday - June 24, 2004
Just Say “No” To Michael Moore
Hold on. I'm about to start a shit storm here.According to The Hill, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) could ban ads for Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" after July 30. I believe they would be perfectly correct in doing so. Wait a minute .... I already hear the Moonbat Democrats howling from the rooftops that this is censorship. Wrong! It's the law.
The McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Law prohibits corporate-funded ads that identify a federal candidate before a primary or general election. This part of the law was intended to restrict large corporations from freely giving their support to a political candidate without going through the process of donating money to a party or candidate, which is also controlled by the law. The whole law is intended to level the playing field and keep election advertising fair.
Is Moore's movie "advertising"? You bet. He makes no bones about the fact that he intends to impact this political election. So he has thrown together this muckadoo film that is partly fact and partly fiction with one purpose in mind: to defeat George W. Bush. He releases it the summer before the election in order to sway your vote. Plain and simple. Not to mention the fact that his ego gets a huge stroking and he stands to make a lot of money. It's advertising for his agenda.
What is advertising? It is simply a method of subtly controlling people's emotions through images and sound to influence them to buy a product. You know what I'm referring to. You are saturated with ads that try to scare you into thinking that your penis is too small or not hard enough, your vagina stinks, you car is not fancy enough, you don't have enough credit cards, your cat or dog is suffering malnutrition .... and the list goes on and on. Fear is the name of the game and they're playing on your emotions. It doesn't matter if you and your wife have sex twelve times a week, you still need viagra. Bullshit.
Fear and bullshit. Is that any way to help people decide who should lead the Free World? Not on your life.
Moore's movie and several others coming out this summer are just that - fear and bullshit, wrapped up as a "documentary" to influence your vote. It's bad enough that Moore is releasing his movie to influence your vote but I for one do not want to have to endure a constant barrage of ads for the movie.
The McCain-Feingold Law was passed in a bipartisan effort to clear the air during an election. All of these outside-sponsored fear/bullshit ads have to stop 60 days before the election. Sixty days is not long but it is something all voters need in order to allow them to step back, examine the candidates rationally, go over each party's positions and listen to the candidates debate. Sixty days to allow our emotions to rest and let us logically make up our minds who to vote for. Is that too much to ask for? Michael Moore and a few other Hollywood fucktards don't think you should be allowed to make a rational decision based on facts. They want to diddle with your emotions.
They tell you the war is going badly. According to the majority of our troops over in "the sandbox" things are getting better every day. Insurgents are being taken out and the handover to an interim Iraqi government is coming up next week.
They tell you the economy is trashed. According to government figures and corporate hiring records, the economy is booming, the stock market is at all time highs, interest rates are still low and the GDP is growing.
They tell you "Bush lied". They tell you the Patriot Act is an invasion of privacy. They tell you prisoners of war are being beaten and tortured. They tell you "Bush is Hitler". I'm surprised they haven't told us yet that "Bush is the Anti-Christ".
Does anyone out there remember the 1992 election? All we heard about was the "homeless" and how cruel the Republicans under Reagan and Bush, Sr. were. Hollywood went berserk, started "Comic Relief" to help all these poor "homeless" people that evil Republicans created. Does anyone know what happened to these "homeless" people? They seem to have disappeared after Clinton was elected. I wonder where they went to?
Gloom. Doom. Fear. Hatred. Anger. Lies. Bullshit. That is what they're selling. And they want you to buy it.
Just say "NO".
Posted by The Skipper
on 06/24/2004 at 02:50 AM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •
• Comments (9)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
Once Again, The One And Only Post
(4 total trackbacks)
Tracked at iHaan.org
Thｅ advantage to having a guide with you is thɑt an expert will haѵe very first hand experience dealing and navigating the river with гegional wildlife. Tһomas, there are great…
On: 07/28/23 10:37
The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We've Been Waiting For
(3 total trackbacks)
Tracked at head to the Momarms site
The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We’ve Been Waiting For
On: 03/14/23 11:20
Vietnam Homecoming
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at 广告专题配音 专业从事中文配音跟外文配音制造，北京名传天下配音公司
专业从事中文配音和外文配音制作，北京名传天下配音公司 北京名传天下专业配音公司成破于2006年12月，是专业从事中 中文配音 文配音跟外文配音的音频制造公司，幻想飞腾配音网领 配音制作 有海内外优良专业配音职员已达500多位，可供给一流的外语配音，长年服务于国内中心级各大媒体、各省市电台电视台，能满意不同客户的各种需要。电话：010-83265555 北京名传天下专业配音公司…
On: 03/20/21 07:00
meaningless marching orders for a thousand travellers ... strife ahead ..
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Casual Blog
[...] RTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPL [...]
On: 07/17/17 04:28
a small explanation
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at yerba mate gourd
Find here top quality how to prepare yerba mate without a gourd that's available in addition at the best price. Get it now!
On: 07/09/17 03:07
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
